邢唷��>� MP��L��欹�� 9bjbj]W]W .T?=?=/1c ��\\� ��8Ld$��cccRTTTTTT$��g!>x�cccccx��c��R�cR��z��0墏2��>�0��,�!�4�!��!��xcc�cccccxx�ccc�cccc��!ccccccccc\ |: 29 April 2015 Halsbury Legal Awards 2015 Lifetime Contribution Award Professor Emeritus Michael Zander QC FBA I write in support of Professor Michael Zander for the Halsbury Lifetime Contribution Award 2015. Few legal careers in modern times have been more remarkable than his. It began when he became a law student in 1953 and it is not over yet. The outline may be briefly stated. He had a brilliant career at university - Double First Class Honours in the B.A. in law at Cambridge, First Class Honours in the LL.B. and award of the prestigious Whewell Scholarship in International Law, followed by a Masters at Harvard Law School. After Harvard he spent a year with Sullivan & Cromwell, one of the great Wall Street law firms. When he returned, he gave up his intention to become a barrister, resigned the Cassell Scholarship at Lincoln抯 Inn, and joined the solicitors� branch, doing his articles with Ashurst Morris Crisp & Co. Soon after qualifying as a solicitor, however, he decided to become an academic, principally, he has said, so that he would be free to write critically about the legal profession. In 1963, he joined the Law Department of the London School of Economics. (In the same year he also became Legal Correspondent of The Guardian, a position he held for the next twenty five years.) He was appointed to a chair in 1977. He retired as Emeritus Professor in 1998 - and carried on working. (The articles in legal journals published since his retirement cover no fewer than ten pages in the Annotated Bibliography.) He combined four different ways of working � teaching undergraduate and graduate students; scholarship with an emphasis on empirical research; communicating with both the general public and decision-makers; and reform (or sometimes opposition to reform) of the profession and the legal system. His publications include eleven books and over three hundred articles in a wide variety of legal journals. His writings for the lay public include over 1,400 articles for The Guardian and three books he edited: What抯 Wrong with the Law? published by the BBC, two editions of the 800-page Family Guide to the Law published by Readers Digest and Pears Guide to the Law. One of the dictionary definitions of 揳cademic� is 損urely theoretical, divorced from practical considerations�. In Michael Zander抯 case, academic has a completely different meaning. His main focus has always been the actual working of the English legal system. (A reviewer of his book Legal Services for the Community wrote in 1979, 揚rofessor Zander in the last fifteen years has been a major influence in transforming the teaching of English Legal System from an uncritical description of the courts and their history into an empirically based study of the system抯 actual operation�.) Moreover, as he stated in his Inaugural Lecture, he regarded his calling as a teacher of law not merely to describe that system, but actively to pursue changes in those parts of the system which in his view needed reform. As he also made clear in his Inaugural Lecture, the practical object was evolutionary, not revolutionary, change. The instruments of change which he recommended were research into the actual workings of the system, discussion, and persuasive argument directed not only to legislators but to the public at large. Michael Zander has pursued these objectives and these methods with unfailing dedication and with marked success over more than fifty years. In addition to his writing, his public lectures and his journalism and broadcasting on legal matters, he has organised and carried out practical research and has worked effectively in, and with, a variety of different bodies concerned with law reform. The Annotated Bibliography gives many examples: During the years 1991-93 Professor Zander was a member of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice (the Runciman Commission). While a member of that Commission he conceived, conducted, analysed and wrote up an empirical study of the operation of the Crown Court (published as The Crown Court Study in 1993). That study entailed the framing of questionnaires addressed to judges, barristers, solicitors, the CPS, police, court clerks, jurors and defendants covering in all some three thousand cases. It was probably the largest study ever carried out in the English courts. He has carried out some two dozen other empirical studies, a number of which had important practical effects - as is the case also with not a few of his other writings. It is widely known that publication of his study of legal aid fees in Crown Court cases, for instance, led to the setting up of the Benson Royal Commission on Legal Services. I believe, on what I think are good grounds, that his May 1977 Criminal Law Review article 揟he Criminal Process � a Subject Ripe for a Major Enquiry� led to the setting up of the Philips Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure which in turn resulted in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) and the establishment of the CPS. His writings had a seminal effect on the establishment of law centres and of duty solicitor schemes in magistrates� courts. As indicated by his impressive Annotated Bibliography, Professor Zander is a prolific author. His Cases and Materials on the English Legal System was a standard text for law students for more than 30 years after its first publication in 1973. (The 10th edition was published in 2007.) A significant book for a different readership � The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, now simply Zander on PACE, is used mainly by practitioners and police officers. The first edition was published in 1985 to coincide with the implementation of PACE. In his Foreword to the 5th edition Lord Woolf (then Lord Chief Justice) described it as 揗ichael Zander抯 most authoritative work�. One of Professor Zander抯 most important books was A Bill of Rights?, first published in 1975. In it he cogently put forward the case for incorporating the European Convention on Human Rights into English law. The 4th edition was published in 1997. No further editions were needed as the desired incorporation took place the following year in the Human Rights Act 1998. He had himself been actively involved in persuading the Labour Party to adopt that policy. A Labour Party Discussion Paper proposing incorporation of the ECHR was launched at a press conference in 1976 by Shirley Williams, Peter Archer and Michael Zander. The arguments put forward by the legislators who proposed the Human Rights Bill and carried it through were essentially those that had been advanced by Michael Zander nearly a quarter of a century earlier. The Annotated Bibliography lists the many submissions he has made to official committees or in response to official reports. In regard to the Benson Royal Commission on Legal Services, Professor William Twining wrote: 揂part from Zander, there was almost no significant input from the academic community. . .[T]he academic community, Zander excepted, appears to have made a minimal impact on the approach, the analysis of particular issues or the recommendations of the Commission� (MLR, 1980). An important part of his work has been print and broadcast journalism. In his Inaugural Lecture in 1978 he said: 揟here is still a feeling in some quarters that an academic demeans himself by engaging in journalism. My own view, precisely to the contrary, is that communication with the general public (quite apart from questions of reform) is part of one抯 proper function as an academic. . . University teachers are paid out of public funds. If they have an expertise in a field in which the public has (or should have) an interest, it is right that it should be made widely available. Disapproval of communication by experts with the general public is mainly intellectual snobbery.� In addition to his writings for non-lawyers he has over the years given innumerable lectures to a wide variety of audiences, including, notably, his Hamlyn Lectures, published as The State of Justice (2000). Most of his broadcasting was in interviews or comments on the current legal topic. But there have also been more considerable programmes. In 1972, after the Criminal Law Revision Committee recommended that the 搑ight to silence� be abolished, Zander wrote and presented a 50-minute programme on the topic for BBC TV. The Daily Telegraph wrote of this broadcast: 揟hough he is himself strongly committed against many of the proposals, his report was a model of its kind � sober, lucid, authoritative and scrupulously concerned to give both sides of the question�. I believe that this comment would be a fair characterisation of Michael Zander抯 style and manner in his writing and his lectures. Now aged 82, Professor Zander is as active and productive as ever. This year, so far, his publications are four articles in the Criminal Law and Justice Weekly, three written submissions to the Justice Select Committee抯 inquiry on the CCRC and a new (7th) edition of his book The Law-Making Process. An article by him on the Justice Committee抯 report has been accepted for publication in the July issue of the Criminal Law Review. He is currently preparing a new (7th) edition of Zander on PACE to be published later this year. Michael Zander抯 career can be seen in two main parts. In the first twenty five or so years he built a reputation not only as a scholar who, unusually for a legal academic, conducted important empirical research of practical relevance, but also as a fearless critic of the legal profession抯 monopolies and restrictive practices. His first book, Lawyers and the Public Interest published in 1968, can be seen as the forerunner of many reforms some of which are still in progress today. In 1978, Michael Beloff wrote: 揑f the public now regard the English legal system less as an ancient and immutable inheritance and more as a piece of living machinery, capable of change and improvement, Michael Zander can claim a special credit. More than any other person or group he has in the last decade transformed the perennial but shapeless grumbles about lawyers and their services into an informed national debate. . .(New Society, 22 June 1978). His criticisms of the legal profession made him unpopular amongst some lawyers. The six-page Postscript to the Annotated Bibliography gives examples of what was being said and written about him, both con and pro. In that period he was a controversial figure. For the past twenty five or so years he has been acknowledged, respected and valued for the role that he plays. He engages in controversy on occasion just as before � for instance, in his opposition to the Woolf reforms of civil procedure which he thought would make a bad situation worse, especially in increasing costs. But he himself is no longer controversial. He was appointed a member of the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice; he was made a QC Honoris Causa (nominated, he was told, by the Bar Council); he became a Senior Fellow of the British Academy; the Home Office had him as one of the lecturers to celebrate its Bi-Centenary; Lord Woolf, when LCJ, and in the current edition, Lord Judge, a former LCJ, wrote the Foreword to his book on PACE; consultant editor of 揅ourts� and of 揅ontempt of Court� in Halsbury抯 Laws of England ; he gave the Hamlyn Lectures; King抯 College gave him an Honorary Degree. In 2009, Professor William Twining, speaking of the role of academic lawyers, said: 揥e have had a few significant public intellectuals: in my time these have included Robert Stevens, Michael Zander, Herbert Hart, Ronald Dworkin, Neil MacCormick and Conor Gearty.� Looking back it is clear that Zander� role has in fact always been consistent. The citation for the Honorary Degree summarised his career appropriately: 揌e has devoted a long and active career to the study, teaching, practice and improvement of the law, and has made outstanding contributions in both the academic and public spheres. There is no greater authority in the fields to which he has devoted himself: criminal procedure, civil procedure, legal system, legal profession and legal services. The central mission of his professional life has been to make the justice system work better.� Many years ago an article in the Economist began, 揗ichael Zander (every profession should have one). . .� Michael Zander has a unique place in English legal life. He fully merits the further honour of the Halsbury Lifetime Contribution Award. Sir Sydney Kentridge KCMG, QC See especially Marcel Berlins, Professor William Twining and Professor John Baldwin (pp.30-33). *+FGR[ipqst��f � � � � � � [ y � � � � � � � � � � � � 14YZ_��耥獒茏厢茚茚轫饲轫庙宽隧炕匪晨晨砜袂憩ìǔ醭が牞駵暱hu*thG'�h 8�h�khE�h�*�hu*th蚎�hS[�h�[h碦�hu*th�#h蚎�hj�h�"�h鯬5� h鯬5� h�"�5�h�"�h�"�5�h�"�hG'�h}�h� qh�#h�#:+GHqrst��e f 45��'(��gdtYXgd騧�gdG'�gdG'�$a$gd�"�$a$gdG'�$a$gd�#��imn�� & ' ( W i � � � � :Cg��345N_q~��"Vm麴祓嘭胸天赛禅睦燃燃母谋汰皓天櫏櫏懃� h�6�h�h�6�h�9htYXh�6�h�h�<�h碦�h騧�h騧�h� qh�?�htYXh騧�h�*�h餖/h�,Zhu*t6�h�,Zh�,Z6�h�,ZhE�hS[�h�)hG'�h�khu*th}�7m��/Xl��$Ustu'():;C{��@YZq��57�� ;EFqw€��Z�J镫珉汶汶戕汶汶谥陔译问坞译齐浦齐挛刖闺蔚腌尉稻М绠绠hE�h{,�hE�hG'�h�� hnc6�hnch�)htYXh(�hE�h蘀%htqh鯬 h�k6�h�kh� qhG'�h�hG'�6� h�6�h�@JKVW$%&'()s�� v��G�� # $ I Q � � � � @!B!C!h!|!}!�!�!�!"-"<"F#I#�#�#�#$$$黟黟桎葜椅疑乓乓乓衫贡乓┮梢古弓弓弓梢乓乓乓湮錆錆櫇湟h��h��h�hG'�6�hRcnhnchRcnhG'�6�hnchG'� hnc6�h�� hG'�6�h� qhG'�h�]hG'�h(�hG'�h(�hQAhG'�6�hE�hG'�h�]hG'�6�<()��""$$t$u$�&�&�'�'<*=*P,Q,�-�-00 1 1�4��gd裭�gdn�勑^勑gdn�gd`�gd?|�勑^勑gd?|�gd{,�gdG'�$b$i$s$u$N&�&�&�&''%'.';'B'C'M'P'f'z'{'�'�'�'�'�'�'�'("(*(B(N(t(x(�)�);*<*=*>*A*J*[*~*€*�*�*�*�*++2+R+麴祓梏桊漯呲诌茵粑梏祓綮痨痨痨嚷级岸ざ毝ざ�h`�h�iaJh�[h-�6乤J h�[aJ h`�aJ hRcnaJ h-�aJ h�<�aJ h� �aJ h{,�aJh� qh{,�h襷S h襷S6� h`�6�h攑{h� �h`�hG'�h?|�h��h黂&5R+h+j+m+�+�+�+�+�+�+�+�+�+,,-,.,>,惭,翱,笔,蚕,驳,�,�,�,�,-$-;-<-E-F-S-b-h-u-�-�-�-�-�-�-�-�-�-�-.蹯驵籽姿了谎混趸掂飕Β灑殩挌挅殠姠啟倖拪唦唝唺~ hn�6�hRcnh-�hn�h� qhM�h襷Shf ~h��hj�he� hn�aJh`�h{,�aJ h��aJ hRcnaJh�[h-�6乤J h-�aJ h攃�aJh`�h-�aJ h�<�aJ h� qaJh`�h�iaJh`�h�i6乤J/....1.7.8.9.@.A.X.�/�/0000+0F0K0X0r0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�0�01 1 1^1r1�1�1�1�1�1O2S2[2�2�2�2 333M3P3_3b3c3o3�3�3麴禅孳中骛甜瑞酿酿鲤鲤鲤娥飑欹天ァ禅欹欹飑鞚倘╈櫏hj�hJLGh��h��h9a�hM�hS[�aJjhtYX0JUhS[�hO�h� qhM� hRcnaJ hM�aJh\(+hn�6乤J hn�aJhe�hn�htYXhRcnh襷S:�3�3�3�3�3�3�3�3�34>4X4Y4[4�4�4�4�4�4�4�4�4�5�5�5�5�5�566J6K6M6N688%8&8'8)82898I8J8U8t8u8v8�8�8�8�8�8999豇麴扈噗桁子子子淄嘴嘴鹕炫禳牲琉降痿苯农钮煒煉� h� qaJh��he� he�aJh�h��hl/�hM�h2:)h2:)6�h2:)hx&�h沎�hJLG h裭�aJh�"�h裭� h讄�6�h讄�h讄�6�h讄�he�h� qhj�h��h��7�4�4�5�5L6M688u8v8�8999 9!9"9#9$9%9&9'9(9)9*9+9��gdG'�gde�gd沎�gd��勑^勑gd��gd��gd裭�9 9!9"9#9$9'9(9)9*9+9-9.9/909P9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9黧祗暹傩膛叹喊湦湦湦湦�jh�'BUh�'Bh沎�htYXjhtYX0JUh(5h}GXhG'�hN8�hG'�hG'�hp=:hG'�aJ h"D�aJ hG'�aJhU6ihe�h�<�he�he�hp=:he�aJ+9,9-9.9/9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9�9��gdG'�,1恏皞. 捌A!盃"盃#悹$悹%�澳澳惸j��666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666�6666666666�666666666666hH66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666�62�� 0@P`p€��2(�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�� 0@P`p€�8X�V~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH P`��PG'�Normal とm$ CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH DA ��D Default Paragraph FontRi��R 0Table Normal�4� l4�a�(k ��( 0No ListT漙��T;� No Spacingm$ CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH >@> 9a�0 Footnote TextCJaJH䁖�H9a�0Footnote Text CharOJQJtH @&`�!@ 9a�0Footnote ReferenceH*L橜2L cq�0Balloon Text�CJOJQJ^JaJR䁖�ARcq�0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^JaJtH PK!檗�[Content_Types].xml瑧薔�0E鱄鼉�-J湶@%閭菐洽|廊�$韶钵UL襎B� l,�3鳛;鉹�得槣B+$�G]ミ7O侪V墎$�┇最�!)O赹齬虲$駓@摪磔�/瓂H*�橊劥�)戅祶鬟粖譛Db俙}"譹蹕擩讞枻肵^�)I`n蘀�紛p)�杵li筕[]�1M<斷绒彥O蠵擊6r�=瘔抸纆b營g吜u崘S賓b嘱€O缽嗕掘肦罝郢櫉反qu 痝嫎Z岸串o~俸lAp發x妏T0�+[}`j纂鹾絲A�帮儲V�2虵蒳朄鰍瀡分�5\|夻蕼汰Nвle瞂�ds趈cs倭惻7琊嵨f坊赅肉W琊�+唻7爤唁`�陲g�葮稠J�雷j|唫h(�驞-姷咩� dX�﹊J曝�(钼x$(��:隶;渌�!�I_蠺到S1ｗ犍鳢�?E��?勉?ZB为m渼錟/魁煜��?瀪篁�誼Y�'奎鼀5襣&螊/燑鲮蓩�>籊餗丟e鴲艱�眢3Vq%'#q��域娡$�8翚K秊�敉)f檞9:牡�澹 x}r�x墘�渨⒇顁�:\TZaG�*檡8I耲鎎R祈c|X呕�强絀 u3KG駈D1�NIB襰鼆� 眍R曦u楘侹>V�.EL+M2�#'歠嫸i~橵�l硔u8z�篐� �*�鏄�:�(W�鈽� ~J攘T鴈\O*餿HG絸HY垫�}KN吡P�*菥甩眿�T鸭�9/#辐A7聁Z��$*c?��韖U咤n嗚w�N蝴%幓O�穒鑸4=3炯N�績)cbJ u�4峦(Tn酸� 7斒_?異鹠-贈皗U逄鰤B�w�襷消╪湐鞘�"Zx娬J躗氺p;嫇熟劐辿/�<�P;檸,)''K蠶踜5棝騫邛苝N喦8疜軬b耬摨� 鸖撡d洯\17 阷鮝�>ОSR!�枒 3晠K4'+�r蘻Q TT３I辈琉疘vt]K芻猥渤K#趘�5+D�眽厍鄜獱O@%\w槉燺鄋N[跮古9K候崢临q桃g錠炆n R!儁+�篣蕁�;�*&�/H時�蟃邀 �>��>\ 宼Υ=.T摹 �觖S; Z鄜�!ㄠ傏�銹��9gi槾咰ぺ�!�# B鰻,欒;匵=刍,I�2UW�9$l╧嗒捋=Aj挄�;顊朅79鍇s*Y摈�;浱爺[嘙C撣�県f华]o栫{oY=1k�yV骋V惺隐5E8鏥k+譁扑蚛8疴计0X4D)�!!��?*|f縱� u洒《"鴛A谸T_矋��帬q矁6�4)k诂u襐�7�顃�'尛%;嬁蟟膦9s�9箈懫�,熵趲-45x鰀娐�8?�菢蟙�/Y|t��&LIL饾J`琛& �-G硉�/��PK! 褠煻'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.rels剰M �0匃倃oo雍�&輬协�勪5 6?$Q祉 �,.嘺緳i粭澤c2�1h�:闀q毩m胳嶡RN壻;d癭値o7�g慘(M&$R(.1榬'J摐袏T鶂�8V�"＆A然蠬鱱}狇�|�$絙{�朠�除8塯/]As賲(⑵锑#洩L蔥汉倪��PK-!檗�[Content_Types].xmlPK-!ブх�60_rels/.relsPK-!ky��theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0軨)��theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! 褠煻'� theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK]� �(�1be�1+T�� mJ$R+.�39�9 !#$%&((�4+9�9"')�8�@��€€€�饞��0�( � �養 �S�� ?�5<��-5J&P&�-�-�-�- 11/1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�106��#,� � � hr��'�'/1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�1�13333333333tt.1/111�1�1�"�.P$��h勑剺⺗勑`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚佛�h劆剺⺗劆`剺﨩JQJ^Jo(噃圚o�h刾剺⺗刾`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚ю�h凘剺⺗凘`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚佛�h�剺⺗�`剺﨩JQJ^Jo(噃圚o�h勦剺⺗勦`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚ю�h劙剺⺗劙`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚佛�h剙剺⺗剙`剺﨩JQJ^Jo(噃圚o�h凱剺⺗凱`剺﨩JQJo(噃圚ю�"�.�� X�U鯬u �:�€Rtq�9跱"�#蘀%黂&�)2:)q+餖/�2(5@[6�'BJLG襷StYX�,Z�[$cnc�i�kRcn� qu*t�y#zy攑{f ~衯l/��"�礐� 8�攃�G'�O�k9��?��<�(��}�� 讄�U/�S[� *�沎��"�E��-�j��9a�e�x&�{,�T�"D�騧��*�碦��;��n�裭�cq�`��@j��<�M�蚎��?|��"�/111�@€�1X@��Unknown��G��*郃x� �Times New Roman5�€Symbol3.��*郈x� �Arial7.��@�Calibri5.��.醄`�)�Tahoma?=� �*郈x� �Courier New;�€WingdingsA��$B�Cambria Math"q�鹦h:G:Gs�4GP �'K惾c .(K�A#��亖20�0F1K僸�HP � $P��G'�2!xx��betsybetsy�鄥燆鵒h珣+'迟0,x€�� $�betsyNormalbetsy2Microsoft Office Word@@*佇@�'��@�'��P �'�胀諟.摋+,0�hp�� Hewlett-Packard�K�0Title !"#$%&'()*��,-./0123456789:;��EFGHIJK��NO��RS��Root Entry�� F`�盇"�Q�1Table��+�!WordDocument ��.TSummaryInformation(��DocumentSummaryInformation8��DMsoDataStore��嗯�2�� b�2��4��Z3��KF1�DQCO2�Z�==2��嗯�2�� b�2��Item ��Properties��UCompObj�� r�� F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.8�9瞦�鄥燆鵒h珣+'迟0��4�� $,Hx€�Normalbetsy2Microsoft Office Word@@*佇@�'��@�'��P �'Lee Jackson&Sydney Kentridge testimonial letter-1